Wednesday, 18 Jun 2008
07:03
daniel_t@earthlink.net
All
Re: May the size argument of operator new overflow?
07:14
jcoffin@taeus.com
All
Re: using character as array subscript
07:19
james.kanze@gmail.com
All
Re: using character as array subscript
07:38
james.kanze@gmail.com
All
Re: May the size argument of operator new overflow?
08:02
canilao@gmail.com
All
Re: fstream issue with ! operator
08:29
cbfalconer@yahoo.com
All
Re: Slightly OT: Compilation question
08:35
v.Abazarov@comAcast.net
All
Re: hiding mechanism, FAQ 23.9
09:30
faisalm83@gmail.com
All
Overloading sizeof operator
09:48
brey_maastricht@hotmail.com
All
Re: Slow manual 'garbage collection' in C++ ??
10:08
PeteOlcott@gmail.com
All
Re: Providing a no-overhead way for a contained class to access its c
10:46
v.Abazarov@comAcast.net
All
Re: Solving nonlinear algebraic systems
11:22
Martin.YorkAmazon@gmail.com
All
Re: Problem with one-liner string conversion
11:40
jkherciueh@gmx.net
All
Re: May the size argument of operator new overflow?
11:53
jcoffin@taeus.com
All
Re: May the size argument of operator new overflow?
12:14
lilith@dcccd.edu
All
Re: Overloading sizeof operator
13:48
james.kanze@gmail.com
All
Re: May the size argument of operator new overflow?
13:50
jl_post@hotmail.com
All
Re: Problem with one-liner string conversion
13:52
james.kanze@gmail.com
All
Re: May the size argument of operator new overflow?
13:54
james.kanze@gmail.com
All
Re: May the size argument of operator new overflow?
13:58
james.kanze@gmail.com
All
Re: May the size argument of operator new overflow?
14:02
nobody@ebi.ee
All
Re: Slow manual 'garbage collection' in C++ ??
14:03
james.kanze@gmail.com
All
Re: Overloading sizeof operator
14:05
james.kanze@gmail.com
All
Re: Problem with one-liner string conversion
14:22
uucp
All
Re: Returning reference to member object
14:24
nobody@ebi.ee
All
Re: May the size argument of operator new overflow?
14:54
acehreli@gmail.com
All
Re: Optimal buffer growth
15:41
uucp
All
Re: Recursive Code
15:44
fn42551@fmi.uni-sofia.bg
All
Re: May the size argument of operator new overflow?
15:44
fn42551@fmi.uni-sofia.bg
All
Re: May the size argument of operator new overflow?
15:47
nobody@ebi.ee
All
Re: Overloading sizeof operator
15:54
jetimms@gmail.com
All
Is it okay to ask questions about Accelerated C++ exercises here?
16:23
zenith@mpiDASHmagdeburgDOTmpg.de
All
Solving nonlinear algebraic systems
17:09
jkherciueh@gmx.net
All
Re: May the size argument of operator new overflow?
17:34
jetimms@gmail.com
All
Re: Is it okay to ask questions about Accelerated C++ exercises here?
17:52
brrk.3001@gmail.com
All
Boost Graph problem
18:48
jcoffin@taeus.com
All
Re: May the size argument of operator new overflow?
18:52
jason.cipriani@gmail.com
All
Attaching a preallocated buffer to an existing std::vector.
18:54
jcoffin@taeus.com
All
Re: Overloading sizeof operator
19:12
joecook@gmail.com
All
Re: Attaching a preallocated buffer to an existing std::vector.
19:14
bop@gmb.dk
All
Re: Slow manual 'garbage collection' in C++ ??
19:16
jkherciueh@gmx.net
All
Re: Optimal buffer growth
19:22
bop@gmb.dk
All
Re: hiding mechanism, FAQ 23.9
19:24
nancygroup1@gmail.com
All
FREE SOFTWARE DOWNLOAD
19:30
jshiva@bigfoot.com
All
===Welcome to comp.lang.c++! Read this first.
19:37
bop@gmb.dk
All
Re: May the size argument of operator new overflow?
20:03
v.Abazarov@comAcast.net
All
Re: Is it okay to ask questions about Accelerated C++ exercises here?
20:58
alfps@start.no
All
Re: Overloading sizeof operator
21:13
fn42551@fmi.uni-sofia.bg
All
Re: May the size argument of operator new overflow?
21:40
NoSpam@SeeScreen.com
All
Re: Providing a no-overhead way for a contained class to access its
21:46
bop@gmb.dk
All
Re: May the size argument of operator new overflow?
22:06
jkherciueh@gmx.net
All
Re: Attaching a preallocated buffer to an existing std::vector.
22:39
daniel_t@earthlink.net
All
Re: Attaching a preallocated buffer to an existing std::vector.
23:06
daniel_t@earthlink.net
All
Re: Is it okay to ask questions about Accelerated C++ exercises here?
23:11
v.Abazarov@comAcast.net
All
Re: Boost Graph problem
23:21
faisalm83@gmail.com
All
Re: Overloading sizeof operator
23:22
vattilah-groups@yahoo.co.uk
All
Re: Problem with one-liner string conversion
23:48
phygon_antispam@gmx.de
All
Re: Providing a no-overhead way for a contained class to access its co
Thursday, 19 Jun 2008
00:45
fn42551@fmi.uni-sofia.bg
All
Optimal buffer growth
00:57
cplusplusquestion@gmail.com
All
Re: Recursive Code
01:41
james.kanze@gmail.com
All
Re: May the size argument of operator new overflow?
01:53
james.kanze@gmail.com
All
Re: Optimal buffer growth
02:47
joecook@gmail.com
All
Re: Recursive Code
03:41
tazmaster@rocketmail.com
All
Is there a better way to do this?
03:46
joecook@gmail.com
All
Re: Is there a better way to do this?
03:47
alfps@start.no
All
Re: Overloading sizeof operator
04:28
dvyukov@gmail.com
All
Re: C++0x: release sequence
04:38
jetimms@gmail.com
All
Re: Is it okay to ask questions about Accelerated C++ exercises here?
04:56
thomas.mertes@gmx.at
All
Re: using character as array subscript
05:10
thomas.mertes@gmx.at
All
Re: Recursive Code
05:27
PeteOlcott@gmail.com
All
Re: Providing a no-overhead way for a contained class to access its c
06:05
daniel_t@earthlink.net
All
Re: Is it okay to ask questions about Accelerated C++ exercises here?
06:13
new@soton.ac.uk
All
Self reference in Template class?
06:26
puppet_sock@hotmail.com
All
Re: Self reference in Template class?
06:41
keith.degrace@gmail.com
All
Turning off template parameter deduction
06:55
new@soton.ac.uk
All
Re: Self reference in Template class?
07:02
pete@versatilecoding.com
All
Re: using character as array subscript
07:06
PeteOlcott@gmail.com
All
Re: Providing a no-overhead way for a contained class to access its c
07:06
ian-news@hotmail.com
All
Re: May the size argument of operator new overflow?
07:08
gpderetta@gmail.com
All
Re: Turning off template parameter deduction
07:10
pete@versatilecoding.com
All
Re: using character as array subscript
07:16
ian-news@hotmail.com
All
Re: May the size argument of operator new overflow?
07:55
keith.degrace@gmail.com
All
Re: Turning off template parameter deduction
08:01
PeteOlcott@gmail.com
All
Re: Providing a no-overhead way for a contained class to access its c
08:10
jcoffin@taeus.com
All
Re: using character as array subscript
08:19
PeteOlcott@gmail.com
All
Re: Providing a no-overhead way for a contained class to access its c
08:35
james.kanze@gmail.com
All
Re: Optimal buffer growth
09:03
mkwahler@mkwahler.net
All
Re: A const behavior I don't understand
09:10
mkwahler@mkwahler.net
All
Re: API Calls in C++
09:14
jkherciueh@gmx.net
All
Re: Optimal buffer growth
09:24
fei.liu@gmail.com
All
Re: Self reference in Template class?
09:25
fn42551@fmi.uni-sofia.bg
All
Re: Optimal buffer growth
09:28
fei.liu@gmail.com
All
Re: Is there a better way to do this?
09:51
fei.liu@gmail.com
All
Re: Turning off template parameter deduction
09:53
fei.liu@gmail.com
All
Re: [Q]:Creating objects _only_ by new ?
10:21
joecook@gmail.com
All
Re: templates and abstract base classes
10:27
zenith@mpiDASHmagdeburgDOTmpg.de
All
Re: Solving nonlinear algebraic systems
10:33
v.Abazarov@comAcast.net
All
Re: templates and abstract base classes
10:55
alfps@start.no
All
Re: Overloading sizeof operator
11:18
pjb@informatimago.com
All
Re: using character as array subscript
11:54
ben.thomas@wickedstudios.com
All
A const behavior I don't understand
12:11
ytrembla@nyx.nyx.net
All
Re: Providing a no-overhead way for a contained class to access its c
12:15
boriss@web.de
All
Re: Recursive Code
12:29
ytrembla@nyx.nyx.net
All
Re: Providing a no-overhead way for a contained class to access its co
12:29
ivan@novickmail.com
All
Re: polymorphic sorting functors
12:42
acehreli@gmail.com
All
Re: Microsoft's so called programmers (ROTFL! :-)
12:51
bjobrien62@gmail.com
All
counfused.. about rule of 3...
13:42
anthony.ajw@gmail.com
All
Re: C++0x: release sequence
13:48
ben.thomas@wickedstudios.com
All
Re: A const behavior I don't understand
14:03
acehreli@gmail.com
All
Re: counfused.. about rule of 3...
14:48
vyacheslav.kononenko@gmail.com
All
Re: Overloading sizeof operator
15:08
vyacheslav.kononenko@gmail.com
All
Re: Microsoft's so called programmers (ROTFL! :-)
15:20
dsmithers@talktalk.net
All
templates and abstract base classes
15:22
thomas.mertes@gmx.at
All
Re: Overloading sizeof operator
15:39
cplusplusquestion@gmail.com
All
Re: Recursive Code
15:58
v.Abazarov@comAcast.net
All
Re: counfused.. about rule of 3...
16:03
greghe@mac.com
All
Re: May the size argument of operator new overflow?
16:31
bastian42@yahoo.com
All
[Q]:Creating objects _only_ by new ?
16:32
jkherciueh@gmx.net
All
Re: Microsoft's so called programmers (ROTFL! :-)
16:33
spoo@flarn.com
All
Re: Microsoft's so called programmers (ROTFL! :-)
16:38
jkherciueh@gmx.net
All
Re: pointer-to-member of pair<>
16:39
vnagrik@gmail.com
All
fopen large file (tera byte) support?
16:49
v.Abazarov@comAcast.net
All
Re: Microsoft's so called programmers (ROTFL! :-)
17:04
tazmaster@rocketmail.com
All
Re: Is there a better way to do this?
17:05
NoSpam@SeeScreen.com
All
Re: Providing a no-overhead way for a contained class to access its c
17:09
chucknorris77@gmx.net
All
Re: Providing a no-overhead way for a contained class to access its co
17:19
bastian42@yahoo.com
All
Re: [Q]:Creating objects _only_ by new ?
17:29
greghe@mac.com
All
Re: Microsoft's so called programmers (ROTFL! :-)
17:45
ytrembla@nyx.nyx.net
All
Re: Providing a no-overhead way for a contained class to access its c
17:55
aral@nurfuerspam.de
All
API Calls in C++
18:18
uucp
All
Re: Recursive Code
18:22
ian-news@hotmail.com
All
Re: May the size argument of operator new overflow?
18:24
uucp
All
Re: fopen large file (tera byte) support?
18:28
aral@nurfuerspam.de
All
Re: API Calls in C++
18:33
cplusplusquestion@gmail.com
All
Re: Recursive Code
18:37
cplusplusquestion@gmail.com
All
Re: Recursive Code
18:55
wangjk@ihep.ac.cn
All
a hard problem about template specification
19:00
cplusplusquestion@gmail.com
All
Re: Recursive Code
19:13
ram@zedat.fu-berlin.de
All
Re: API Calls in C++
19:47
sam@email-scan.com
All
Re: fopen large file (tera byte) support?
19:51
ManicQin@gmail.com
All
Re: Is there a better way to do this?
20:17
nkomli@gmail.com
All
VS2005 to gcc
20:24
hrnilesh.cyntel@gmail.com
All
20-6-2008 –¶walkin,IT FRESHER,IT EXP OPENINGS
21:03
adem24@nospammplease.org.invalid
All
Microsoft's so called programmers (ROTFL! :-)
21:04
uucp
All
Re: Recursive Code
21:37
Tejas.Patki@gmail.com
All
Application crashes while using OTL class
22:02
stu33404@mail.uni-kiel.de
All
polymorphic sorting functors
22:06
jackklein@spamcop.net
All
Re: Microsoft's so called programmers (ROTFL! :-)
22:07
cplusplusquestion@gmail.com
All
Re: Recursive Code
22:07
cplusplusquestion@gmail.com
All
Re: Recursive Code
22:14
adem24@nospammplease.org.invalid
All
Re: pointer-to-member of pair<>
22:28
williamgates@web.de
All
Re: Microsoft's so called programmers (ROTFL! :-)
22:34
DenPlettfrie@gmail.com
All
Re: polymorphic sorting functors
22:36
roadtang@gmail.com
All
Re: a hard problem about template specification
22:38
roadtang@gmail.com
All
Re: a hard problem about template specification
22:43
stu33404@mail.uni-kiel.de
All
Re: polymorphic sorting functors
22:53
eric.pruneau@cgocable.ca
All
Re: a hard problem about template specification
23:09
wahab-mail@gmx.de
All
Re: Microsoft's so called programmers (ROTFL! :-)
23:22
roadtang@gmail.com
All
Re: polymorphic sorting functors
23:24
DenPlettfrie@gmail.com
All
Re: Overloading sizeof operator
23:44
DenPlettfrie@gmail.com
All
Re: A const behavior I don't understand
Friday, 20 Jun 2008
00:13
jkherciueh@gmx.net
All
Re: VS2005 to gcc
00:34
roadtang@gmail.com
All
Re: templates and abstract base classes
00:45
wangjk@ihep.ac.cn
All
Re: a hard problem about template specification
00:53
nobody@ebi.ee
All
[OT] Re: API Calls in C++
01:12
roadtang@gmail.com
All
Re: postfix operator++(int) with const
01:35
roadtang@gmail.com
All
Re: Turning off template parameter deduction
01:44
roadtang@gmail.com
All
Re: Is there a better way to do this?
02:05
contact@emiasys.com
All
Some perfomance thoughts required
02:32
wangjk@ihep.ac.cn
All
Re: a hard problem about template specification
02:58
mtervoo@web.de
All
Re: fopen large file (tera byte) support?
03:42
tommy.hinks@gmail.com
All
Re: Some perfomance thoughts required
03:42
naumansulaiman@googlemail.com
All
Can singleton be owned by any object other than itself
03:57
greghe@mac.com
All
Re: Can singleton be owned by any object other than itself
04:27
naumansulaiman@googlemail.com
All
Re: Can singleton be owned by any object other than itself
04:58
PeteOlcott@gmail.com
All
Re: Providing a no-overhead way for a contained class to access its c
05:20
greghe@mac.com
All
Re: Can singleton be owned by any object other than itself
06:19
NoSpam@SeeScreen.com
All
Re: Providing a no-overhead way for a contained class to access its
06:33
tazmaster@rocketmail.com
All
Re: VS2005 to gcc
07:35
jcoffin@taeus.com
All
Re: polymorphic sorting functors
07:43
jcoffin@taeus.com
All
Re: Some perfomance thoughts required
07:55
tazmaster@rocketmail.com
All
Re: Is there a better way to do this?
08:14
adem24@nospammplease.org.invalid
All
Re: VS2005 to gcc
08:43
v.Abazarov@comAcast.net
All
Re: templates and abstract base classes
09:07
dsmithers@talktalk.net
All
Re: templates and abstract base classes
09:11
dsmithers@talktalk.net
All
Re: templates and abstract base classes
09:14
uucp
All
Re: Providing a no-overhead way for a contained class to access its co
09:18
uucp
All
Re: Can singleton be owned by any object other than itself
09:20
anguscomber@gmail.com
All
can you do if((myptr) && (myptr->IsGreen()) without blowing up?
09:25
james.kanze@gmail.com
All
Re: counfused.. about rule of 3...
09:26
peter.koch.larsen@gmail.com
All
Re: can you do if((myptr) && (myptr->IsGreen()) without blowing up?
09:34
james.kanze@gmail.com
All
Re: May the size argument of operator new overflow?
09:36
anon@no.no
All
Re: Recursive Code
09:42
james.kanze@gmail.com
All
Re: Microsoft's so called programmers (ROTFL! :-)
10:01
4one@gmx.at
All
postfix operator++(int) with const
10:04
tazmaster@rocketmail.com
All
Re: can you do if((myptr) && (myptr->IsGreen()) without blowing up?
10:08
nobody@ebi.ee
All
Re: [OT] Re: API Calls in C++
10:13
pjb@informatimago.com
All
Re: using character as array subscript
10:18
zenith@mpiDASHmagdeburgDOTmpg.de
All
Re: postfix operator++(int) with const
10:39
aral@nurfuerspam.de
All
Re: [OT] Re: API Calls in C++
10:57
4one@gmx.at
All
Re: postfix operator++(int) with const